Rob Witwer’s article Rocky Ride tells the fascinating story of how Republicans were caught sleeping while independent groups not associated with the Democratic Party managed to convert a Republican state to a Democratic state, up and down the ballot. In essence while McCain-Feingold regulates contributions to political parties and candidates, it ignores non-profit entities even when those entities work together for specific political ends. The article is a must read for those concerned with the direction our current administration is taking the country. I recommend a National Review subscription, http://nrd.nationalreview.com/
Democratic
success in Colorado is in large part the result of what
Stein calls a “more strategic, more focused, more
disciplined, better financed” progressive movement.
In hindsight, what Colorado Democrats did was as sim-
ple as it was effective. First, they built a robust network of non-
profit entities to replace the Colorado Democratic party, which
had been rendered obsolete by campaign-finance reform.
Second, they raised historic amounts of money from large
donors to fund these entities. Third, they developed a consistent,
topical message. Fourth, and most important, they put aside their
policy differences to focus on the common goal of winning elec-
tions. As former Democratic house majority leader Alice
Madden later said, “It’s not rocket science.”
campaigning now consists of paid staff, television and radio ads,
glossy mailers, and platoons of hired door walkers.
The shift of political discourse away from candidates and
towards outside groups has created a tangible change in Col-
orado’s political culture. Campaigns tend to be more negative
#1 by Gene on April 4, 2009 - 5:00 pm
Do you think that the "nonprofit" status of the entity can be attacked if the majority of the funds are raised and spend to support political candidates? A site supporting liberal candidates might get away with it easier than a conservative entity.
#2 by Gene on April 4, 2009 - 5:00 pm
Do you think that the "nonprofit" status of the entity can be attacked if the majority of the funds are raised and spend to support political candidates? A site supporting liberal candidates might get away with it easier than a conservative entity.
#3 by Tom Motherway on April 4, 2009 - 6:40 pm
If the purpose is education of the public for the common good and truly independent of those entities regulated by McCain-Feingold which in the Colorado case it was, I don't see how it can be attacked. I believe the "message" could always be "issue oriented" with candidates as examples of being on the correct side of the issue. Perhaps though it could be more direct. In Colorado these entities were purely voluntary. That said, more research needs to be done on the election finance issue and the tax status.