Archive for April, 2009

Is Taxpayer Tim Stupid or Simply a Control Freak

The Venture Capital firms in Silicon Valley can’t figure out what Geitner means  when he testifies that they cause systemic risk to the financial system. These firms invest equity raised from wealthy investors in start-up with new technology. They don’t borrow money; debt leverage is not used. They are the essence of entrepreneurial risk-taking. Silicon Valley has put America in the lead on a world wide basis. How could an industry which has spawned the likes of Google, Cisco and Amazon, pose “systemic risks” to the financial system?

Tiny Tim, not the brightest bulb on the tree, compares the VC firms to Madoff’s Ponzi scheme and says they need regulation. He fails to mention that Madoff’s firm was subject to regulation and didn’t invest in venture capital at all. Perhaps he just doesn’t understand that the regulators were simply stupid and got the wool pulled over their eyes several times.

The consequences of micromanagement and over regulation are a migration of technological excellence to more entrepreneurial environments outside the Untied States.

I have questioned our tax-challenged secretary of treasury’s intelligence in the past, but in this case I suspect that he is being a bit disingenuous. As with other Obamaites, he simply wants to control everything. “Liberty” and “pursuit of happiness” are simply not in his lexicon.

Tom Motherway

No Comments

Point-Counterpoint: Bubble to Depression (the government managed economy)

Don Parsons passed on an excellent analysis of the causes of our current recession by Steven Gjerstad and Vernon Smith published in the April 6th edition of the Wall Street Journal. The comparison of the relatively mild tech bubble with the devastating real estate bubble is particularly enlightening; in one case market losses were easily absorbed, in the other governments were brought to their knees. There are many fathers of each bubble. The difference is that the real estate losses were transferred to the financial markets through significant leverage.  The government action in each case is clearly distinguishable. 

The commentary on this excellent analysis is contained in four letters to the editor in the April 9th edition of the WSJ. These by economists contain supplemental ideas as well as some criticism.

The combination of analysis and commentary gives us an in depth study of our current troubles and the government’s attempts to overcome them.

1 Comment

Best Not to be Poor in DC and Want an Education

Deroy Murdock points up the hypocrisy of Obama and his Democratic Congress in killing the successful DC voucher program. Turns out that Arne “lets play hoops” Duncan hid a study showing success of the program. Guess we should expect this from these low life rulers.

With young black kids themselves begging for vouchers, why would reputedly pro-poor, pro-black Democrats kill this popular and effective school-choice program?

Follow the money: Teachers’ unions’ paid $55,794,440 in political donations between 1990 and 2008, 96 percent of it to Democrats. Senator John Ensign’s (R – Nevada) March 10 amendment to rescue DC’s vouchers failed 39-58. Among 57 Democrats voting, 54 (or 95 percent) opposed DC vouchers.

As the late Albert Shanker, former American Federation of Teachers president, once said: “When school children start paying union dues, that’s when I’ll start representing the interests of school children.”

When poor, black school kids start making political donations, Democratic politicians will start fighting for them.

Deroy Murdock is a New York-based columnist with the Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow with the Hoover Institution.

via RealClearPolitics – Articles – Obama Admin. Stifles Favorable DC Voucher Study.

No Comments

Alternative & Renewable Energy References

What a broad topic we have on the table for the upcoming discussion. As with all of our topics, our discussions will be updated and ongoing from dinner to dinner. Below I offer a few links for reference:

A very comprehensive site is available from the Energy Information Administration which publishes the official energy statistics from the US government. 2006 is the last published edition. Charts galore, here!

The ubiquitous Wikipedia serves up a good page which as with some of their topics is a work in progress. Here you get excellent graphics which are worth a thousand words. Check it out.

Back to the government for the third reference, at National Atlas. This is a fairly good descriptive article on US renewable energy sources.

The issues are economic, environmental, political, international in nature and all with national security aspects.

No Comments

Fed’s Assets Doubled in 6 Months and Will Do So Again

In the last quarter of 2008 the Fed’s balance sheet footed at about $1 Billion. It’s now over $2 Billion and according to the CBO has the potential to hit $5 Billion. How’d they do that you ask? Click here to see a step by step graphic tracking the key events and amounts of junk on that balance sheet, which Jerry O’Driscoll was kind enough to send us. Note the difference between the relatively clean high quality assets last year and the “colorful” expanded assets this year. Who will buy this stuff when the it’s time to contract money supply and raise rates?

1 Comment

Economics of “Crisis” Could Be $200 Oil

Don Parsons sends us a “deep dive” study into peak oil by Jim Quinn of The Burning Platform.com. This is very detailed treatment of the problem, well documented with excellent charts. Don would only add that more space should have been devoted to depletion which is the heart of the current problem. Needless to say the Obama administration is blind to the problem.

No Comments

Obama, the Mega Detroit CEO, Digs the Hole Deeper

It’s hard to believe but Obama’s Treasury is giving two bankrupt auto companies, GM and Chrysler, the job of administering $3.5 Billion in credit for the auto-parts companies. See the Bloomberg item here. So what we have is a government that is working its way to bankruptcy trying to support two bankrupt auto companies giving them the authority to manage $3.5 Billion of taxpayer money. Great to know Washington is managing our tax dollars so astutely!

Tom Motherway, tom@renohayek.com

3 Comments

Musings on the Age of Obama by Thomas Sowell on National Review Online

Since January we have seen Obama’s domestic policies; this week we now see his sycophantic and dangerous foreign policies. Both are disastrous for the future of this great nation. I have nothing to add to Thomas Sowell’s excellent musings set out in full below:

Musings on the Age of Obama

The president seems determined to repeat every disastrous mistake of the 1930s.

By Thomas Sowell

I am so old that I can remember when music was musical.

Now that the federal government says that it will stand behind the warranties on GM’s automobiles, does that make you more likely or less likely to buy a car from GM? If you were a rising young executive with a promising future, would you be more likely or less likely to go to work for a company where politicians can fire you?

We have become such suckers for words that politicians can spend our tax money like a drunken sailor, provided they call it “investment.” At least the drunken sailor is spending his own money — but people look down on him because he doesn’t call it “investment.”

Barack Obama seems determined to repeat every disastrous mistake of the 1930s, at home and abroad. He has already repeated Herbert Hoover’s policy of raising taxes on high income earners, FDR’s policy of trying to micro-manage the economy, and Neville Chamberlain’s policy of seeking dialogues with hostile nations while downplaying the dangers they represent.

We seem to be moving steadily in the direction of a society where no one is responsible for what he himself did but we are all responsible for what somebody else did, either in the present or in the past.

The famous editorial cartoonist Herblock could write as well as draw. In one of his books, he said something like: “You too can have the soothing feeling of nature’s own baby-soft wool being pulled gently over your resting eyes.” I think of that every time I see Barack Obama talking.

It has long been said that uncertainty is the hardest thing for a market to adjust to. No one can generate uncertainty as much as the government, which can change the rules in midstream or come out with some new bright idea at any time, as the current administration has already demonstrated.

We have now reached the truly dangerous point where we cannot even be warned about the lethal, fanatical, and suicidal hatred of our society by Islamic extremists, because to do so would be politically incorrect and, in some European countries, would be a violation of the law against inciting hostility.

Perhaps the scariest aspect of our times is how many people think in talking points, rather than in terms of real world consequences.

Barack Obama’s favorable reception during his tour in Europe may be the most enthusiastic international acclaim for a democratic government leader since Neville Chamberlain returned from Munich in 1938, proclaiming “peace in our time.”

How a man who holds the entire population of a country as his prisoners, and punishes the families of those who escape, can be admired by people who call themselves liberals is one of the many wonders of the human mind’s ability to rationalize. Yet such is the case with Fidel Castro.

What does “economic justice” mean, except that you want something that someone else produced, without having to produce anything yourself in return?

Perhaps the way President Obama will reduce the deficit is by making more presidential appointments of people who will pay the back taxes they owe, in order to get confirmed by the Senate.

Liberals seem to think that they are doing lagging groups a favor by making excuses for counterproductive and self-destructive behavior. The poor do not need press agents. They need the truth. No one ever said, “Press agents will make you free.”

If I were Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner, I would not sign any long-term lease on a home in Washington.

Socialists believe in government ownership of the means of production. Fascists believed in government control of privately owned businesses, which is much more the style of this government. That way, politicians can intervene whenever they feel like it and then, when their interventions turn out badly, summon executives from the private sector before Congress and denounce them on nationwide television.

— Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.

via Musings on the Age of Obama by Thomas Sowell onNational Review Online.

Tom Motherway, tom@renohayek.com

2 Comments

Is This Guy For Real?

James Lewis’ article “Those Arrogant Americans” in American Thinker as published in Real Clear Politics is set out below in full. He properly questions Obama’s intelligence. Apparently our young president doesn’t realize that the United States has been defending the free world since the early 20th century. We Americans have used our hard earned taxes to pay the defense bill while Europe enjoys its socialism and extended vacations. We work, they play. Yet, Obama curries favor with these bloated socialists even as he tries to remake America in their image. Bravo to James Lewis for calling Obama as he sees him! 

We have a rock star president who for the first time in American history fired the President of a private corporation, General Motors, then immediately flew to Europe with an entourage of 500 courtiers and a worshipful media, bowed waist-deep to the King of Saudi Arabia, and proceeded to accuse his own country of arrogance.

In France, of all places.

Does anybody else think this guy is shockingly ignorant? I wonder if he has every really talked to a concentration camp survivor, or a Cuban refugee, or a boat person from Vietnam? Or a Soviet dissident. Or a survivor or Mao’s purges.

 

Not to mention families with fallen American soldiers in the graveyards. Yes, he’s going to Normandie, but will he apologize for our arrogance there, too? Does he really understand anything beyond the PC history of the world? Or will he just lie in his photo op at the American Cemetery at Normandy?

Ahhh, those arrogant Americans. First they rebel against King George III and all the crowned heads of Europe. Then they welcome tens of millions of poor and persecuted people from the Old World. Then they fail to bow down to Europe’s greatest figures — from Napoleon and Otto von Bismarck to the Kaiser, Hitler and Stalin. Then they fight a civil war, losing half a million people to liberate black people in America. Then they diss the man the BBC considers to be the greatest philosopher ever, one Karl Marx, whose followers killed 100 million innocents in the 20th century. And then, to top it all off, they liberate both the Western half of Europe (in 1946) and the Eastern half (in 1989).

What arrogance these Americans have. Either that, or a very, very — no, stunningly — ignorant man was just elected president. What kind of man has such an obsessive need to put down his own country? Especially given our real history? Has he ever read an honest history book?

via RealClearPolitics – Articles – Those Arrogant Americans.

5 Comments

Hubris of the Liberal Ruling Classes

Hubris is excessive pride or self-confidence, arrogance. It came from the ancient Greeks who prized and praised arête, meaning excellence, excellence in competition, in the arts, in statesmanship, in trade and indeed in battle. But with arête came the temptation to excessive pride, arrogance, outrage and “presumption toward the gods.” Hubris was that unforgiveable sin that brought condemnation in Athens. Old expressions like, “too big for his own pants,” and newer ones like, “a legend in his own mind,” come to mind as the beginning of hubris.

But perfect, spot-on examples are larger than life in Washington, DC where our ruling liberals reign supreme:

·      Last week we had Obama firing the CEO of General Motors, this after telling GM what kind of cars to build and demanding a tougher restructure. Note he did not fire the head of the UAW. Note also that, instead of putting the company in bankruptcy where those with money at risk who are legally entitled to control the salvageable remnants of that albatross could install competent management, he poured billions of taxpayer money into the carcass.

·      Today following Obama’s heady example we have the nations chief tax collector, who by the way intentionally didn’t pay his own taxes, saying that he was going to fire bank executives and directors at banks that require “exceptional” government assistance. Of course the government will determine what banks are forced to take “exceptional” assistance. It is important to remember that major banks are now restricted from giving back the “assistance” they were forced to take. Tiny Tim Geithner who can’t even staff his own Treasury department is going to take on the task of installing competent management at major banks!

·      Then we have the show last week of the government leaning on secured Chrysler lenders to pressure them to agree to a equity for debt swap and give up the security they would be entitled to in bankruptcy. All this to get a deal done for the benefit of a foreign auto manufacturer, Fiat S.A. Apparently, there is no thought of a conflict of interest here much less of the health of the Chrysler secured lenders that they say they’re trying to protect.

·      Not to be outdone by the executive branch the Democratic Congress has pressured the Financial Standards Accounting Board (FASB) to loosen the profession’s mark to market rules. If the Chris Dodds and Barney Franks of that world think they are competent enough to establish accounting rules, investors had better beware.  Anyway we will magically solve many of the banks bad asset problems by changing the rules, changing the definition of what is bad. In truth though, the bad asset that is no longer a bad asset hasn’t changed one iota! Japan tried something akin to this and suffered ten years of stagnation.

It gets boring to retell the earlier aspects of Obama’s rush to Big Brotherhood, the non-stimulus plan, the deficit tripling budget, the 8000 earmarks, the tax increases for the benefit of the non taxpayers, the cap and trade stealth tax. Suffice it to say that the ruling liberals know with metaphysical certitude what is best for each and every one of us and each and every one of our grandchildren not yet born! This is hubris at its best.

Tom Motherway, tom@renohayek.com

 

 

21 Comments