Archive for April, 2010
A Little Levity From Chuck Muth
One of Chuck’s Mini-Muth’s Truths today was this gem: “In unrelated news, Nevada Sen. Harry Reid said this morning that he’s as popular as he’s ever been, while his son Rory said he’s as charismatic as he’s ever been. Meanwhile, Nevada state Treasurer Kate Marshall declared yesterday that she’s as competent as she’s ever been, while Rep. Dina Titus announced that she’s as moderate as she’s ever been.”
Pray that all will stay so popular, charismatic, competent and moderate until November! Thank you, Chuck. Nevada News and Views and Muth’s Truths are as spot on as ever!
If Greece is Europe’s Achilles Heel…and Europe Falls….
Posted by Tom in Economics, Entitlements, Europe, National Character, National Debt, Nationalized Health Care, Social Security, Welfare on April 28, 2010
I’ve seen items from John Muldin and George Friedman this week analyzing the Greek debt/deficit debacle. Greece is one of the PIIGS of Club Med, the European nations who cannot afford their welfare systems. Greece cannot borrow to fund its largess; its credit rating is junk according to S&P. It is seeking European and IMF bailout aid, the amount of which is dependent on uncovering the accounting tricks it has heretofore used. Normally the IMF would use devaluation as one tool but that is not possible here because of the Euro. Greece will fail.
Sovereign debt problems are forecast for Spain and Portugal also, as they have suffered downgrades. Causes of their problems are similar but the significance is greater as the Spanish economy along with Italy which may follow soon is simply too big for Germany to bail out. Fiscal contagion is a serious problem.
So, let a few PIIGS fail, so what? Problem here is with the European banks. They hold the PIIGS bonds. Without regard to those underwater assets, the European banks were already in trouble since they did not clean up their bad real estate related assets. Think the Japanese banks of the 1990s. Friedman says the even at the peak of the U.S. subprime crisis European banks were in worse shape. How much worse shape now with the PIIGS crisis?
A Euro devaluation? A break-up of the European Union? At least, a significant period of de-stability for a major consumer in the world economy and a significant producer in that economy. Germany will survive in better shape than the rest. The PIIGS are likely to exist outside a re-formed European Union.
Add the fact that the U.S. is not the consumer that it once was. Thankfully, it is de-leveraging more, saving more, and consuming less. It hopes to expand its exports but who will pay the desired price? China? The rest of Asia? Thus the world economy will really be upside-down with a lot of areas trying to be producers but none trying to be consumers!
But the real concern is that the U.S. is a budding Greece bubble waiting to pop. In ten short years 93 cents of every dollar of government revenue will go to pay entitlements and interest on the debt. Obama has put us on the path to become a Europe on steroids just when Europe is exploding! Before Obama took office our entitlements thanks to Roosevelt, Johnson and Bush were on an unsustainable path. Rather than correct this Obama added another major entitlement, Obamacare, which will bankrupt our nation.
Several questions present themselves in this scenario: What of defense? Iran, North Korea, Russia and China are all real and potential problems. We spend so much on butter that we con’t afford guns. What of our assets and businesses? In a declining economy how will be work, live and invest? And, from a personal survival standpoint if the economy declines toward the subsistance level, is it guns and gold to survive? I know my farming skills aren’t all that good!
But there is hope if we recognize that big government must be drastically cut, public employee pensions and compensation reduced to the level of private compensation, entitlements including social security, medicare and medicaid cut in half, and Obamacare repealed and replaced by consumer-based, non-tax advantaged health care. We have a very short window in which to accomplish this dramatic turnaround. Let’s educate the voters and elect people who will get the job done.
“I am Ann Frank”
Posted by Tom in Foreign Policy, Individual Freedom, National Character, Terrorism on April 27, 2010
This, one of the powerful ending lines in Jeffrey Lord’s American Spectator article, Jon Stewart Flunks His Spartacus Test, in which Stewart’s position on Comedy Central’s censorship of South Park’s episode on Islamic fanatics is slammed. Lord sets the courage test in terms of Kubrick’s Spartacus, the iconic film of the Greek gladiator at Capua and his courage to the last. With that in mind he fast forwards to United Airlines Flight 93 on 911 where ordinary Americans were confronted with their Spartacus moment and proudly passed the test earning our tribute or what the ancient Greeks would call arete, courageously living up to their full potential, excellence.
Faster forward to today and the edgy, over-the-top, iconoclastic South Park created by Trey Parker and Matt Stone who decided to take on Islamic Fascists but gently by disguising the Prophet Mohammed as a bear. A web site called “Revolution Muslim” warned the creators that they would end up like Theo Van Gogh, the Dutch film maker killed by Islamic terrorists after he made a film on the treatment of Muslim women. This fatwa put the fear of Allah into Comedy Central which promptly bleeped a 35 second speech warning of “fear and intimidation.”
Now to Jon Stewart, darling of the leftists, brave defender of Democrats, epitome of all moral good. Jon gets his chance to stand up for Free Speech. Jon get his “Spartacus test.” What say, this paragon of leftist virtue, when confronted with intimidation based censorship by Comedy Central?
“It’s their right,” he said of Comedy Central in a verbal shrug of indifference. “We all serve at their pleasure.” In other words, they sign the checks!
The problem is that these Islamic terrorists want to bury us. “American and Western culture — the good, the bad and the ugly of it over a few thousand centuries, from Plato to Parker and Shakespeare to Stone — can thrive only in an atmosphere of intellectual freedom. That freedom, as has been made abundantly clear since 9/11, is under full scale assault.”
“The right answer is never to pretend that if you somehow were transported back in time, say to a house in Amsterdam in August of 1944 and the German Grüne Polizei were pounding at your door, you could get away with saying: “Hi. Fox News can %$#@@ themselves. You guys sign the checks. Seig Heil. Ann Frank is upstairs, third door to the right, the room behind the bookcase.”
“The right answer would be, the right answer is always: I am Ann Frank.”
The clever, liberal leftist, Jon Stewart gets an F on his Spartacus test. For all practical purposes, his Obama Hussein idol with his fawning Mideast diplomacy has also flunked the Spartacus test. A great article by Jeff Lord.
Deficit Addiction or Entitlement Addiction?
Posted by Tom in Deficit, Economics, Entitlements, National Character on April 27, 2010
Gerald Seib has an excellent column in today’s WSJ, Hi. My Name is America, and I’m a Deficit Addict; it stirs up even more interesting reader commentary. Basically he takes the kick off of Obama’s National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform and the Peter G. Peterson all star economic conference tomorrow as an opportunity to get serious about our fiscal problems. He suggests talk is not enough, and no real reform action will be taken in an election year, but he does posit a beginning.
Both parties should confess the addiction and their contributions to the problem, Medicare and Medicare Part D included. Then both parties must acknowledge that the tax system has to be changed. “The Tax Foundation says the levies paid by the top 1% of taxpayers now exceed those paid by all of those in the bottom 95%. And the Tax Policy Institute says almost half of all filers will pay no 2009 income taxes at all, because of various exclusions and credits—up, by some estimates, from a quarter in 1990.”
Next, “Americans have to change how they think about retirement. When the economy recovers and costs for recession-related bailouts, stimulus spending and unemployment benefits are resolved, we’ll still be left unable to really afford our Social Security, Medicare and long-term-care commitments. When the easier stuff is done, this is the hard reality, requiring a new and nonpoliticized national discussion.”
So while the new commission’s co-chairmen avow that “nothing is off the table,” it’s a good bet that politics will trump good intentions. Taxes yes, entitlement cuts no.
What we do not hear from our politicians is the immorality of the theft of our children’s future. Do the entitlement recipients really understand this? If they are forced to understand it, would they still want to continue that theft? No one has asked that question which is really the heart of the matter.
To compound the sin against our children and grandchildren we leave the unsustainable entitlements in place offering a false sense of retirement security. Has any leader started to educate the younger generation that there will be no Social Security and no Medicare? They will be bankrupt long before the younger generation retires.
So I would add a major education program to Jerry Seib’s suggestions: the commission should focus seniors on the seriousness of the theft from their children and grandchildren and should focus the children on the lack of future retirement security so they can provide for themselves. If both are done well, my bet is that tough reform will be undertaken, the economy will strengthen, and our children will have a brighter future simply because it will become more independent and self-reliant.
I recommend Seib’s article and the extensive reader commentary which is accessed by clicking the comment tab above the text. There are some good suggestions and debates therein which is in itself encouraging.
Hope in Our Future
Posted by Tom in Law, Morality & Religion in the Public Square, National Character on April 26, 2010
Our last dinner meeting was quite depressing with its undeniable projections for our future given Obama’s totalitarian deficits, debt and unfunded liabilities coupled with his ambition to burden us with more. Big Government, Big Redistribution, socialism to communism to nazism from Obama, Reid, and Pelosi in one easy term!
It’s refreshing then, the other day, to get this email from one of our younger members who’s not only a businessman but an activist.
Tom, In light of last time’s gloomy economic discussion, I wanted to pass along a few statistics from where I sit in the manufacturing world – where I believe the future potential and economic growth of our country lies:
O’Driscoll Comments on Hayek’s Nobel Lecture
Jerry has a revelatory post on our namesake’s Noble Lecture, The Pretence of Knowledge, delivered in 1974 on his acceptance of the Nobel Prize in Economics. Jerry makes the point in Hayek After 35 Years that a centrally managed economy not only doesn’t work but it exacerbates current economic imbalances which occur and correct naturally if Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” is allowed to work.
The ’70s were Carter’s years with all his abysmal attempts to control the market. We see a repeat now with King Hussein and his minions. What Hayek criticized was the economic discipline’s pretense of knowledge, knowledge of the elite (economists) as a substitute for knowledge of the market, the invisible hand, warts and all!
What we learn is that the leftists take no lesson from history, recent or past. Hubris in their ranks abounds. The ancient Greeks knew that hubris, excessive pride, would eventually be punished by the gods. Would only that Obama, Reid, Pelosi and company would learn this ancient lesson!
Younger Generation Getting Concerned
“You Picked a Fine Time to Lead Us, Barack” by Jonathan McWhite
SEC Regulation Fails to Stimulate–Staff Opts For Porn
Posted by Tom in Centrally Managed Economy, Financial Crisis, Government Regulation on April 24, 2010
During one of the worst financial crises, while Madoff was making his millions and Wall Street making its billions, senior SEC officials making over $200,000 per year were using government computers to watch porn over the internet!
Obama and the Democrats want to give them more regulatory authority and greater responsibility. So whether it’s “too big to fail,” bail out slush fund, consumer protection agency or general total control of financial services, regulatory incompetence is the issue.
Dodd and company ignore one of the primary causes of the financial debacle, Fannie and Freddie incompetence, and proceed to give more regulatory authority to our failing regulators.
We over pay government employees to watch porn while the financial system collapses. What’s not to like about big government? Thank you Hussein Obama.
PC Cowardliness–Caving To The Towel-heads!
Posted by Tom in Humor, Individual Freedom, Law, Morality & Religion in the Public Square, National Character, Press on April 24, 2010
Sadly disappointing news that Comedy Central backed down to death threats against “South Park” creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone and bleeped an episode warning against “intimidation and fear” by Islamic fanatics who were offended by the show. Heretofore the network has stood behind nearly all the over-the-top satire despite protests and calls for boycotts.
But where Islam and the prophet Mohammed is concerned, the First Amendment’s guarantees of Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press no longer apply.
Even sadder that the supposedly “fair and balanced” Bill O’Reilly questioned the creator’s judgement in writing and producing the piece. Towel-heads have Bill a bit unbalanced perhaps. See Diana West’s Media Leave “South Park” Creators Out to Dry in Real Clear Politics.
The conclusions of the New York Post article, Cowardly Central are appropriate here: As UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh noted, the consequence of Comedy Central kowtowing to a blatant death threat “is that the thugs win and people have more incentive to be thugs. Behavior that gets rewarded gets repeated.” Alas, regarding radical Islam, the behavior that “gets rewarded” is murder — Exhibit A: Theo Van Gogh. Revolution Muslim may be little more than a couple of Queens cranks with Web access — but who’s willing to take a chance on that? Not Comedy Central, that’s for sure. And until the West decides — culturally and collectively — not to take it any longer, it’s only going to get worse.
“Land of the Free and home of the Brave?” No, not at all. We have already been conquered by “fear and intimidation!” Practice your Sharia law, you attorneys, because before long that’s what will govern us.

Obama Budget Cuts
Posted by Tom in Deficit, Democrats, Financial Policy, National Debt, Obama Budget & State of the Nation on April 23, 2010