Archive for February, 2012

Obama’s First Amendment Route to Cloward-Piven Socialism

The Cloward-Piven strategy, named for two Columbia University socialists, suggests that if the welfare system is intentionally overloaded it will collapse and ultimately destroy the federal fisc. The subsequent chaos will force the electorate to accept socialism as the saving economic system. To call this Machiavellian would be an understatement. Recall Rahm Emanuel’s instructive quip: “You never want a crisis to go to waste.” Now, look at the country three years after the Obama-Democrat election sweep in 2008. Half the country pays no taxes; almost half receives some federal welfare assistance.

The First Amendment prohibits the establishment of a religion and guarantees the free exercise of religion. That freedom has its application in the conscience clause, which allows citizens to avoid mandates repugnant to their religious beliefs. Thus, we had “conscientious objectors” during the war. And since Roe v. Wade, it has protected health care providers from being forced to provide services repugnant to their beliefs.

This latter application was significantly applicable to our medical delivery system in Catholic hospitals. Significant because 16% of the hospital beds in this country are provided by Catholic hospitals. And, significant portions of the non-compensated services are rendered by Catholic hospitals. This comports with the Catholic charitable mission.

Catholic hospitals were delivering medical care long before the government took over this part of the U.S. economy. Medicare and Medicaid only recently came into existence in 1965 as part of Lyndon Johnson’s “Great Society.”  These social programs continued to grow with George Bush’s Medicare Drug coverage. They have reached a recent apex with Obamacare. With this legislation Obama and the Democrats have taken over fully 16% of the U.S. economy. Catholic hospitals as existing health care providers are compensated for medical services under these social programs, as are other hospitals.

But now Obama under Obamacare, has mandated that Catholic hospitals provide abortion insurance coverage for all employees knowing full well that abortion, the intentional taking of an innocent human life, is abhorrent to the Catholic faith. This leaves Catholic hospitals little choice but to cease serving the communities in which they operate. Such a result will put further strain on the delivery of medical services, particularly Medicaid services and charitable services to the poor. Strain on the welfare system is exactly what Cloward-Piven posits as the necessary step, the sine qua non, to the system overload that would eventually result in socialism.

Now, to review the bidding, half the population pays no income tax, almost half is dependent on government assistance, and Obama is waging a class warfare campaign. He’s right on board with the “Occupy Whatever” movement and is clearly using welfare checks to buy the necessary votes to maintain power.

That Obama would abrogate the First Amendment freedom of religion to further strain the welfare shows how dangerous the man is and how far he would drive the country to socialism. And, if he will intentionally do this with Catholics on the abortion issue, he will stop at nothing. What will prevent him from conditioning FCC licensing on a loyalty oath, or federal education aid on party registration, or federal contracts on direct union membership rather than prevailing wage compliance. All these are contrary to the basic freedom and limited government upon which this country was founded.

If you think this view of Obama’s actions are far fetched, I invite you to listen to Fr. Sammie Maletta’s homily claiming his right as an American citizen and duty as a Catholic priest to object to this violation of First Amendment’s rights, here. This priest has credentials as a civil attorney and has intelligence and courage that few bishops have. He correctly predicts socialism will result.

1 Comment

The Great Hayek-Keynes Debate

I want to thank Tom Cargill, Mark Pingle and Jerry O’Driscoll for the excellent presentations of Lord John Maynard Keynes and Friedrich von Hayek at Tuesday’s  dinner meeting. Jerry acted as moderator between the two “opponents,” while the rest of us discovered how little practical disagreement really existed between them. Yes the philosophies, individualism and collectivism, are diametrically opposed but the practical applications are not as far apart as the Keynesian disciples make them out to be. Our government’s actions over the last three-quarters century have to a large extent been neo-Keynesian in nature, but Keynes would discourage many of them.

We had excellent audience participation with questions addressed to the “lord” or the “von” with pertinent rejoinders when required. Of import we noted the fact that several current and future political leaders were part of the audience. In that sense the Symposium and particularly our economists are serving a public purpose, which will hopefully portend a better future for all of us.

Please join me in thanking Tom, Mark, and Jerry for an excellent evening

No Comments

C-Pac Inspiration: Daniel Hannan

I hesitate to post long videos, but this worth your time. Daniel Hannan is a member of the European Parliament from Britin.

1 Comment

“Statolatry” = Idolatry of the State

This post from Jerry O’Driscoll:

The decision of HHS Secretary Sebelius’ to narrow the conscience exception should come as no surprise. Under her interpretation, employers must provide contraception as “preventive health service” under Obamacare. That includes abortifacients, like the morning-after pill. Religious institutions, like hospitals and schools, are not exempt.

In 2007, Jonah Goldberg authored a book with the provocative title of Liberal Fascism. Goldberg’s thesis is that there is an affinity between modern American liberalism and fascism.  He defined liberalism as the “ideology of good intentions” that can end up in “the totalitarian temptation.” The Sebelius decision was a classic example of what Goldberg meant.

He defined Fascism as “the religion of the state.” Mussolini was clear about that. “Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State.” The current conflict between the Obama administration and the Catholic Church (and other religions) has an historical precursor.

Mussolini waged jihad against Catholic social organizations, notably Catholic Action. Their social activities, including with youth, were viewed as operations “outside the State” and hence a threat to it. The activities were treated as political actions adverse to the state. In the fascist mindset, all mediating institutions threaten the state. In this instance, the Obama Administration is dangerously close to adopting that mindset.

In 1931, Pope Pius XI issued an Encyclical defending Catholic Action and the Church (Non Abbiamao Bisogno). He noted that “liberty and right are the heritage of souls.” In strong language, reminiscent of the strong language of U.S. Bishops today, Pius XI said the fascist ideology “clearly resolves itself into a true, a real pagan worship of the State – the ‘Statolatry’ which is no less in contrast with the natural rights of the family than it is in contradiction with the supernatural rights of the Church.”

In its pursuit of the good intentions of promoting women’s health, the Obama administration has succumbed to the totalitarian temptation. It has trampled the Constitution’s protection of the free exercise of religion. Instead of permitting Americans to practice the faith of their choosing, it endeavors to make us all worship in the pagan religion of the State.

Jerry O’Driscoll

No Comments

Happy 101st, Mr. President

Boy…do we miss you!

No Comments

Constitution’s First Amendment Is Nothing To Obama

As an American Catholic, I am appalled at Obama and his “Catholic” minion, Sebelius, who ignore the Constitution. I shouldn’t be surprised, they have continually done that before. What follows is a statement read this weekend in Catholic churches throughout Nevada. Freedom of religion is at stake here:

Note the conclusion in the third to last paragraph: To abide by the law, leads to a violation of our moral teachings. To ignore the law makes us subject to fines and other consequences. To act within the “nonexemption” leads us to abandon our mission to serve people in need. None of these is acceptable to people of faith.

This is what lead to the founding of our great nation. Freedom from religious persecution.

And the critical last question posed by the Nevada bishops: “Where else will this regulation lead?”

Obama and his ilk must be stopped for the sake of our freedoms.

1 Comment