Archive for category Defense

The World’s Policeman Has Become the World’s Enabler

It can’t continue. It has got to stop. Since the end of WWII we have been the western world’s policeman, unpaid despite the sacrifice of our blood and treasure. We rebuilt Europe and Japan following the war then we paid for and continue to pay for their defense. As a consequence we have enabled the socialistic welfare states of Europe to increase their welfare. Now, to the point where the weaker ones are bankrupt. To top that off our president is taking the country in the same welfare state direction and the Fed is attempting to continue helping Europe kick the can down the street supporting the zombie European nations.

I was impressed with Ed Crane’s comment in a WSJ op-ed on Ron Paul that the U.S. spends more than the rest of the world on defense–in essence defense of the western world! ”…an overreaching military presence around the world is inconsistent with small, constitutional government at home. The massive cost of these interventions, in treasure and blood, highlights what a mistake they are, as sensible people on the left and right recognized from the beginning. Of course we want a strong military capable of defending the United States, but our current expenditures equal what the rest of the world spends, which makes little sense. It is futile to try to be the world’s policeman…”

My point is that to the extent we overspend on defense, Europe doesn’t need to spend. Their taxes to the extent paid go to increase statist expansions and welfare in countries like Greece, Portugal, Italy and Spain.

To top that off, our Fed seems to think it legitimate to help finance Europe’s profligate ways. Jerry O’Driscoll exposes Bernanke’s covert effort to bail out the ECB in his recent WSJ op-ed highlighted in our blog. This is clearly ultra vires, beyond the legal power of the Fed and against what its chairman has publicly stated.

In effect we have given Europe the leeway to expand its welfare state beyond its capacity to pay for that expansion. Our president who has no concept of economics admires the European model and seeks to expand our own welfare state beyond its capacity to pay for the expansion. His statist stimulus expenditures were nothing more than payments to increase the size and scope of government. His Obamacare takeover of medicine is nothing more than an unsustainable entitlement addition to the already unsustainable entitlements of Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.

We have enabled Europe’s welfare/statist addiction at a time when we can’t afford our own addiction. That latter addiction is theft from our grandchildren. Immorality par excellence! It must stop!

No Comments

D-Day, Lest We Forget

This from Ty Cobb:

 Friends,

In 1984 President Ronald Reagan and allied leaders attending the G-7 Economic Summit left London and gathered in Normandy to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the D-Day invasion, the difficult but eventually successful battle that turned the tide of the war in Europe. My God, it hardly seems possible that it was 27 years ago!

President Reagan gave two extraordinarily moving speeches that day, one at Omaha Beach with President Francois Mitterand, and another, more remembered, at Point du Hoc–the cliffs the Rangers scaled in the face of German artillery firing directly down on them. This was a U.S. only ceremony, and many of the Rangers who survived that assault were on hand to hear the President that day. I was fortunate to be in charge of coordinating the visit and the event, and it was a moment that none of us there will ever forget.

Here is a link to the President’s speech–you may want to listen to Reagan and reflect on the significance of this anniversary.

– Ty

No Comments

TSA Flack…….all sides of the issue

Now we have heard all the talking heads pontificating on the TSA’s enhanced screening procedures, all sides of the issue…..except perhaps this musical version by Buck Howdy:

No Comments

Arab Nations Not Opposed to Military Action Against Iran

The WikiLeaks purloined documents reveal an Arab acceptance of the difficult take down of Iran and its nuclear capability. Here’s the very interesting report from Stratfor (www.stratfor .com) which I highly commend.

Here’s the link: http://www.stratfor.com/analysis/20101129_dispatch_wikileaks_and_irans_nuclear_program

No Comments

Obama & Holder Get Their Wish: Terrorist Goes Free

As suggested in my October post, Obama and Holder do not want Gitmo terrorists to suffer justice. They want them to go free. They try them in civilian courts so that the civilian rules of evidence and the constitutional protections accorded citizens will apply to these killer.

Yesterday, they got the desired result with one Ahmed Ghallani the first Guantanamo Bay detainee to be tried in a civilian court. Recall this is the follow that helped with the 1998 US embassy bombing. He was acquitted on all but one of the 285 charges against him.

The New York Post article, Terror-trial travesty, tells the story:

“After all, on the merits, the evidence against Ghailani was overwhelming:

* He helped buy the truck that carried the bomb in the attack on the embassy in Tanzania.

* A detonator was linked to him.

* A key witness had told authorities that he sold Ghailani the explosives.

Indeed, Ghailani practically confessed to his role in the affair himself. But his statements weren’t introduced at trial.

Defense lawyers had argued that Ghailani’s disclosures were inadmissible because they were coerced — and prosecutors were loath to risk having their entire case tossed by the judge.

Under normal circumstances, that’s fine. But this case involved a foreigner making war on America.”

In other words this is an enemy combatant, a foreigner who is not entitled to US constitutional rights including a civilian trial; he is entitled to a military tribunal.

The Post article also included a wonderful picture of Eric Holder, the Attorney General of the United States.

Would you buy a used car from this man?

1 Comment

Obama & Holder Want Terrorists Acquitted

Today’s New York Daily News editorial, Error by trial: Very first Guantanamo case in civilian court is an instant disaster, details the problems of trying military prisoners, foreign terrorists that have committed foreign acts of terror, in U.S. civilian courts and granting the rights of U.S. citizens in the process. On trial was one Ahmed Khalfan Ghallani an admitted participant in the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania killing 224 including 12 Americans. Caught in Pakistan after training with Al Qaeda in Afghanistan he was interrogated and confessed.

“These facts come courtesy of Ghailani’s own mouth. He revealed them under interrogation while in clandestine CIA custody before transfer to Guantanamo. Therein lies the legal absurdity.

The CIA grilled Ghailani in the interest of national security – to prevent further terrorist attacks – and not as a run-of-the-mill criminal suspect with full U.S. constitutional rights.

Thus, Ghailani had no lawyer. Thus, in the words of Manhattan Federal Judge Lewis Kaplan, Ghailani was subjected to a “combination of social influence approaches and extremely harsh interrogation methods to obtain evidence” – techniques that were used “to obtain intelligence from a handful of detainees believed to possess particularly high-value information.”

So, years later, come time for opening statements in Kaplan’s courtroom, prosecutors chose not even to try entering a word of Ghailani’s testimony into evidence. Instead, they hung their case largely on one Hussein Abebe, a Tanzanian who was prepared to testify that he had sold five crates of explosives to Ghailani.

Bad move. Kaplan yesterday barred Abebe from taking the stand because the FBI tracked him down based solely on information provided by Ghailani under “coerced” questioning.

This ruling was distressingly inevitable.”

Now Obama and Holder are educated attorneys well versed in criminal and constitutional law. It is safe to say that they know that the rights of the accused in the U.S. are much more protective than the rights of: (a) terrorists in Kenya, (b) criminals in Pakistan, and (c) enemy combatants detained in war time. In short, Obama and Holder knew that this instant ruling was “distressingly inevitable.”

Why then, would the Commander in Chief charged with the defense of this nation and his chief law enforcement officer Attorney General Holder choose to take this wartime prosecution out of military hands and place it in New York, the site of the World Trade Center attacks on September 11th?

I have previously highlighted Dinesh D’Souza Obama analysis on these pages, but Kathryn Lopez’s NRO interview with D’Souza goes into greater depth and convinces me that his analysis is correct. In that analysis, Obama is an anti-colonists down to his core, socialists yes, but more important an anti-colonists. He favors the suppressed, exploited natives in Kenya, Pakistan perhaps those in the war regions. His father from which his dreams come, Dreams from My Father, was Kenyan. The interview is a must read.

D’Souza denies that Obama is merely a conventional liberal: “But conventional liberals don’t come out for the release of the Lockerbie bomber. Conventional liberals don’t return the bust of Winston Churchill from the Oval Office. Conventional liberals don’t block oil drilling in America while subsidizing oil drilling in Brazil.Conventional liberals don’t try to turn the space agency NASA into a Muslim-outreach program. My anti-colonial theory beautifully explains all these facts.” There is indeed predictive value in this theory.

So I think it reasonable to believe that, despite protestations to the contrary, Obama wants acquittals in these civilian terrorists trials.

1 Comment

Remembering 911…Then Imagining Islam

On this 9th anniversary of 911, I think back to that early morning phone call–”turn on your television.” Dede and I watched in horror from our California home, smoke and flames from the gaping tear in the WTC North Tower, then a plane hitting the South Tower. The Pentagon explosion and the heroic flight 93 Pennsylvania crash followed. Our planned vacation that morning was cancelled….no matter, I did not feel like a vacation.

There were plenty of good memorials posted today. Some will bring tears, like “Remembering Patrick Sullivan” by  Jack Dumphy who tells of a brother naming his kids “Mary Patrick and Shane Patrice.” You get the picture.

But the one that impressed me most is less poignant and more accusatory, more an indictment of our progressive, politically correct, and invincibly naive ignorance.  Andrew McCarthy’s NRO post “Imagining Islam” is a wake up call to all sensible Americans, no all sensible Westerners.

Andy posits a fantasy Islam that is secular and moderate. This religion is dedicated to human rights, against slavery, modern and tolerant of other religions and cultures. Arguably such a religion would have condemned the murderous killing of innocents that preceded and followed those of the WTC. It would have issued those condemnations loudly and en masse for at least the last nine years.

But for the last nine years we have heard nothing but silence.

“What excruciating truths have we yet failed to grasp on this ninth anniversary of 9/11? The first is that such an Islam does not exist. The second is that, despite this fact, American foreign and domestic policy continues to proceed as though it does exist — and as though it were the only real Islam. That is, nine years after Islamists made their commitment to our destruction as unmistakable as possible, nine years after the non-occurrence of all the wonderful things that would certainly have happened if the Islam of our dreams were the Islam of our reality, our national-security strategy is still steeped in fiction.”

Hussein Obama has put America on a foreign policy of “self delusion.” We no longer wage a “war on terror” but instead engage in sporadic “overseas contingency operations.” If we avoid saying whom we are fighting and why, we soon forget. Our president, our commander in chief, goes through the Arab world bowing and appeasing. He fights our natural allies and weakens our defenses. He now tolerates a nuclear Iran whose president shouts “Death to America!”  He has our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan pursuing “nation building” with Shria law! This the law that stones women and kills homosexuals and bans religious minorities.

In the U.S. we defend the Islamists monument to the 911 slaughter at ground zero proffered by an imam paid by the U.S. State Department. This part of the religion of peace intends to take over our country not by violence but by out populating us and enacting Shria law as it is now doing in Europe.

But the violent wing of this fantasy religion of peace is still alive and healthy: “At home, even as al-Qaeda continues its efforts to reprise 9/11, a network of Islamist organizations — coordinated by the Muslim Brotherhood and financially backed by our friends, the Saudis — proceeds with what it calls its “grand jihad” to eliminate and destroy Western civilization by sabotage. This is not a secret. The Brotherhood’s internal memoranda were seized by the FBI. They boldly announce these claims in black and white. Two years ago, the Justice Department aptly labeled the constituent organizations — including the Islamic Society of North America and the Council onAmerican Islamic Relations — as unindicted co-conspirators in a terrorism-financing case in which several of their partners were convicted of funneling millions of dollars to Hamas. Today, those Islamist organizations are right back in business, with an open door to “engaging” government policymakers, as if nothing ever happened. In our imagination, they’re moderates, too.”

Hussein Obama’s policies weaken us. By failing to recognize our enemy and the values it seeks to impose, we eventually fail to recognize our own values and will soon lose them, to our regret.

3 Comments

Irresponsibility of Leftist Press-Treason

WikiLeaks is anonymous. No identified founders. No manager. No nuthin! Oh, there the is that cute little fop, Julian Asuange who describes himself as being on the WikiLeaks advisory board. He recently released Pentagon files, heretofore secret, on the war in Afghanistan. As a result according to Defense Secretary Gates, the lives of our troops and our Afghan partners are in danger.

This is not a case of “loose lips sink ships;” this an intentional broadcast of secret information while the country is at war. The military traitor should get military justice.

But the rub is the self important Julian Assnage and his co-conspirators in the New York Time, the Guardian and Der Spiegel, the so-called responsible press. In the NYT case, it’s printing all the news “fit to print”

As Tony Blankley points out in his “Wiki Espionage” post their conduct is a clear violation of the Espionage Act (Title 18 U.S. Code, Section 794). Opposition to the war cannot justify treason.

“If Mr. Assange had perpetrated this outrage against Russia, inevitably there would be a news report a few month later announcing the death of Mr. Assange and his loved ones (should he have any) because of an unlikely street accident. Thank goodness we live in nation of laws — not of executive actions.

“But the rule of law will not last long if the law is not used to avenge grievous wrongs committed against our nation.

“It is the high duty of our government not to let Mr. Assange walk free (assuming the evidence in court of his espionage is as convincing as the news accounts suggest). Let the federal prosecutions proceed — wiki, wiki.”

The conceit, self aggrandizement, and above-the-law attitude of the NYT is appalling.

No Comments

Gingrich on the Islamic Terrorist Threat

No Comments

America’s Twilight? Or, Is There Anyway Out?

Niall Ferguson’s discussion of the Future of America’s Economy was recently given at the 2010 Aspen Ideas Festival. It is brilliant and I would embed it here but am unable to do so, thus I link it and strongly commend it. As a financial historian teaching at Harvard, he asks whether the Western Ascendency is finished. He reviews the empirical evidence supporting that proposition. And, it is strong.

“My working assumption is that the financial crisis that began in the summer of 2007…has accelerated a fundamental shift in the economic balance of power. Even before the crisis, Jim O’Neill and his team at Goldman Sachs were forecasting that China’s gross domestic product would exceed that of the United States in 2027 at half past four on October the 15th, which is just a little pinch of salt to remind you that all such projections need to be taken with a pinch of salt. Still, whether it’s 2027, ’28, ’29 or ’30, the interesting thing is the first time they made that projection, they thought it would be 2040. Every time I see Jim, I say, “Have you moved the date forward yet?” because he made that 2027 call before the financial crisis.

“The financial crisis unquestionably has hit the United States much harder than China. Their stimulus worked much better than ours…The first point I just want to put out there is: it’s hard to believe, under these circumstances, that the acceleration, the shift, if you’d like, from West to East hasn’t been speeded up by this crisis.

“The second point is: Of course, power is not just about GDP. It’s not just about the economy. Power is also about the ability to project hard power through military means. And some people in Washington like to comfort themselves by saying, “We can still do that way more than they can. Count their aircraft carriers, count ours.”

“But one point that follows from the financial crisis which is terribly, terribly important is that by combating our crisis of private debt with an extraordinary expansion of public debt, we inevitably are going to reduce the resources available for national security in the years ahead. Because as the debt grows, so the interest payments you have to make on it grow, even if interest rates stay low. And on current projections, the federal debt is going to be absorbing around 20 percent, a fifth of all the taxes you pay, within just a few years. The item of discretionary federal expenditure most likely to be squeezed is, of course, defense. And there are lots of historic precedents for that. So, I fear that the financial crisis doesn’t just impact on the economy. It actually impacts on American power in the hardest sense.”

This is just a taste, and he does offer some hope, so I won’t spoil his offering but suggest you link to the talk.

No Comments