Archive for category Nationalized Health Care
Even Libs Learn The Hidden Cost of Obamacare
Posted by Tom in Business, Democrats, Nationalized Health Care, Welfare on August 26, 2010
Surprise, surprise, colleges want a waiver from Obamacare. If asked to name a liberal bastion as left as the Fourth Estate it would be the universities. Obama is their product, their teacher, their community organizer and their ordained leader. So why are they chafing from his most progressive achievement, Obamacare? Well according to an editorial piece in today’s WSJ, the law “could make it impossible for colleges and universities to continue to offer student health plans.” That’s how the American Council on Education and a dozen other higher-ed lobbies put it in a recent letter to the Obama Administration, warning that the insurance coverage they offer may get junked by ObamaCare’s decrees.” Seems that the bureaucratic “one size fits all” plan will cost too much for the 4.5 to 5.5 million students annually enrolled in college plans. Logical indeed, when you consider the average age of the students.
Of course, we the unwashed masses who will be taxed to pay for this unaffordable welfare program know the truth. EVERYONE WILL PAY….THE POOR STUDENTS…AND THE EMPLOYEES. That’s right, you won’t need to earn over $250,000 to suffer under this monstrosity. The people who can least afford it will be penalized most.
This from my friend Joe Morabito to his U.S. employees: “Hello All: We just sat through a horrible presentation done by our insurance broker related to the impact of Obama’s HealthScare Plan on our medical and other benefits. Let me be clear, for any employee who believes this is a “scare tactic”, effective next January, 2011; all will be paying significantly more for medical and other benefits because Paragon cannot absorb the cost increases that are coming as a result of ObamaCare. Further, as we go into 2012 – 2014, other elements of the plan kick in that will impact our entire benefits program so big changes will be coming related to how and from whom you buy your health insurance. If ObamaCare is not repealed first, we may, or may not, have a company sponsored plan based on what is most advantageous to both Paragon and our employees. What I know for sure is that Paragon cannot afford the insurance premium increases and additional administrative costs that are coming as a result of Obama’s HealthScare Plan. We will have to consider all alternatives.”
“As you go to the polls next November, I suggest you vote for candidates that advocate REPEAL of Obama’s HealthScare Plan, which will be a disaster for Paragon and our employees. Clearly, it is impossible to insure 30 million uninsured, (plus potentially 12 million illegal aliens) without someone paying the bill. In this case, those who already have health insurance and senior citizens will be paying that bill. Elections have consequences. JM”
The hidden tax that is Obamacare is only starting to be unmasked. There will be more “surprises!” None of them will be good.
As Joe says, “elections have consequences!”
Deflation, A Self Fulfilling Prophesy?
Posted by Tom in Business, Centrally Managed Economy, Deficit, Fed, Financial Policy, Monetary Policy, National Debt, Nationalized Health Care, Taxation on August 3, 2010
When Bill Gross, the bond guru manager of Pimco Total Return Fund, says “it’s happening,” he brings credibility to the deflation first scenario, that is deflation before inflation. According to yesterday’s WSJ article many fund managers are loading up on US Government bonds and hedging stocks. Others expect the Fed to come to the rescue. The Fed has limited options since it has interest rates near zero. According to another WSJ report these options are “unorthodox!” As the Fed mulls these, it may spook investors and highlight the weakness in the economy. So when the Fed is playing offense in trying to reflate the economy, savvy investors might conclude as Gross did that it’s time to play defense. Typically these “unorthodox” measures mean increasing the money supply by buying bank assets good and bad, bonds and mortgage backed securities. Problem is that there are not too many bullets left in the Fed’s arsenal.
To cap matters off, vis a vis the “self fulfilling prophesy,” today’s WSJ leads the front page with “Fed Mulls Symbolic Shift” that is using cash from maturities to buy additional assets instead of letting its portfolio shrink to a stable economy level. The Fed’s $2.3 Trillion portfolio has nearly tripled in size since 2007!
So, what to do? If prices are going to be lower tomorrow, why buy today? And this, ad infinitum! Couple this with Hussein Obama’s proposed tax increases, the pile on of entitlement deficits from Obamacare, and the great uncertainty posed by the regulatory bureaucracy, and you get a bleak picture.
Hope I’m wrong!
You Pay While Musicians Play With Free Health Care!
Posted by Tom in Deficit, Democrats, Nationalized Health Care on May 20, 2010
Comrade Nancy Pelosi is really a socialist, and one who likes music, to wit:
Primary Cause of Inflation
Posted by Tom in Centrally Managed Economy, Deficit, Economics, Education Facts & Policies, Entitlements, National Character, Nationalized Health Care on May 13, 2010
I’ve been on vacation this past week and enjoyed some interesting discussions during that time. One on inflation: it occurs strictly speaking from excessive demand or inadequate supply, push-pull inflation. With one of our friends graduating from Notre Dame this weekend it struck me that inflation in education is excessive, that is way out of line with general inflation.
Gordon Wadsworth’s article, Sky Rocketing College Costs, presents this data which is about a year old but conveys the messarg well:
Another area of significant above average inflation is medical care. John Commins post, Costs of Medical Care Outstrips Inflation, pegs hospital service inflation in the last 12 months at 8.6% almost quadruple the 2.3% increase in the overall CPI. Physicians services was up 3.2% and prescription drugs up 4.9% for comparable periods.
I submit that the major reason for the off the chart inflation in each of these areas is the government involvement in each. There is not a true market in either. If there were price increases would be more in line with general inflation.
The leftist progressives from Dewey on have mandated public education which has evolved to public employee unions, outrageous non-market compensation, and an uneducated public.
The leftist progressives from Roosevelt on have pushed socialized medicine subsidized with tax policy and out of control Medicare/Medicaid bureaucracies. Obamacare is the final nail in this coffin.
How have we allowed ourselves to get to this inflated entitlement oriented society? While I’m hesitant to use comments from foreign nationals, this one by Peter Lakatos from Hungary to Mark Toomey sadly seems to get to the heart of the matter:
“The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president.”
“The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America . Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.”
Now back to education. For all its inflated costs how good is it? Would it be better if government were completely out of it? Would our society have more common sense? And, would that society be foolish enough to elect another Obama?
For the sake of our grandchildren’s future we need to get the monster government on a starvation diet and get it out of our lives!
If Greece is Europe’s Achilles Heel…and Europe Falls….
Posted by Tom in Economics, Entitlements, Europe, National Character, National Debt, Nationalized Health Care, Social Security, Welfare on April 28, 2010
I’ve seen items from John Muldin and George Friedman this week analyzing the Greek debt/deficit debacle. Greece is one of the PIIGS of Club Med, the European nations who cannot afford their welfare systems. Greece cannot borrow to fund its largess; its credit rating is junk according to S&P. It is seeking European and IMF bailout aid, the amount of which is dependent on uncovering the accounting tricks it has heretofore used. Normally the IMF would use devaluation as one tool but that is not possible here because of the Euro. Greece will fail.
Sovereign debt problems are forecast for Spain and Portugal also, as they have suffered downgrades. Causes of their problems are similar but the significance is greater as the Spanish economy along with Italy which may follow soon is simply too big for Germany to bail out. Fiscal contagion is a serious problem.
So, let a few PIIGS fail, so what? Problem here is with the European banks. They hold the PIIGS bonds. Without regard to those underwater assets, the European banks were already in trouble since they did not clean up their bad real estate related assets. Think the Japanese banks of the 1990s. Friedman says the even at the peak of the U.S. subprime crisis European banks were in worse shape. How much worse shape now with the PIIGS crisis?
A Euro devaluation? A break-up of the European Union? At least, a significant period of de-stability for a major consumer in the world economy and a significant producer in that economy. Germany will survive in better shape than the rest. The PIIGS are likely to exist outside a re-formed European Union.
Add the fact that the U.S. is not the consumer that it once was. Thankfully, it is de-leveraging more, saving more, and consuming less. It hopes to expand its exports but who will pay the desired price? China? The rest of Asia? Thus the world economy will really be upside-down with a lot of areas trying to be producers but none trying to be consumers!
But the real concern is that the U.S. is a budding Greece bubble waiting to pop. In ten short years 93 cents of every dollar of government revenue will go to pay entitlements and interest on the debt. Obama has put us on the path to become a Europe on steroids just when Europe is exploding! Before Obama took office our entitlements thanks to Roosevelt, Johnson and Bush were on an unsustainable path. Rather than correct this Obama added another major entitlement, Obamacare, which will bankrupt our nation.
Several questions present themselves in this scenario: What of defense? Iran, North Korea, Russia and China are all real and potential problems. We spend so much on butter that we con’t afford guns. What of our assets and businesses? In a declining economy how will be work, live and invest? And, from a personal survival standpoint if the economy declines toward the subsistance level, is it guns and gold to survive? I know my farming skills aren’t all that good!
But there is hope if we recognize that big government must be drastically cut, public employee pensions and compensation reduced to the level of private compensation, entitlements including social security, medicare and medicaid cut in half, and Obamacare repealed and replaced by consumer-based, non-tax advantaged health care. We have a very short window in which to accomplish this dramatic turnaround. Let’s educate the voters and elect people who will get the job done.
Job Wanted
Posted by Tom in Centrally Managed Economy, Employment, Nationalized Health Care on April 9, 2010
Please, don’t anyone make waves. I desperately need employment, just ask my wife. I am applying for a position on # 3 below. Wish me luck.
NEW Boards and Commissions created under the new health care law
1. Grant program for consumer assistance offices (Section 1002, p. 37)
2. Grant program for states to monitor premium increases (Section 1003, p. 42)
3. Committee to review administrative simplification standards (Section 1104, p. 71)
4. Demonstration program for state wellness programs (Section 1201, p. 93)
5. Grant program to establish state Exchanges (Section 1311(a), p. 130)
6. State American Health Benefit Exchanges (Section 1311(b), p. 131)
7. Exchange grants to establish consumer navigator programs (Section 1311(i), p. 150)
8. Grant program for state cooperatives (Section 1322, p. 169)
9. Advisory board for state cooperatives (Section 1322(b)(3), p. 173)
10. Private purchasing council for state cooperatives (Section 1322(d), p. 177)
155. Indian Health Service program for treatment of child sexual abuse victims (S. 1790, Section 181, p. 192)*……………………………..
…………………………156. Indian Health Service program for treatment of domestic violence and sexual abuse (S. 1790, Section 181, p. 194)*
157. Indian youth telemental health demonstration project (S. 1790, Section 181, p. 204)*
158. Indian youth life skills demonstration project (S. 1790, Section 181, p. 220)*
159. Indian Health Service Director of HIV/AIDS Prevention and Treatment (S. 1790, Section 199B, p. 258)* *Section 10221, page 2173 of H.R. 3590 deems that S. 1790 shall be deemed as passed with certain amendments
Law is Meaningless for Liberals in Carson City and Washington
Posted by Tom in Centrally Managed Economy, Congress, Constitution, Democrats, Nationalized Health Care, Nevada, Statism on April 7, 2010
I just finished a Nevada News Bureau blogger’s news conference with the attorney representing Nevada pro bono contesting the constitutionality of Obamacare, since our Democratic AG, Cortez-Masto refuses to represent Nevadans. Mark Hutchinson is special counsel for the state by virtue of Governor Gibbons’ executive order appointing him. The AG has committed a statutory misdemeanor by refusing to act. The AG doesn’t seem to be concerned with law, at least a law that binds her. She will do or not do as she pleases.
This is emblematic of the liberal or progressive–as they want to be euphemistically called–mindset. This country, indeed, this state came into being as a government of laws as contrasted with a government of people. The left from Wilson’s time on has bridled at this restraint.
For Obama, Pelosi, Reid and the Democrats, the U.S. Constitution has no meaning. The 10th Amendment reserves to the states or the people all powers not specifically delegated to the federal government. There is no constitutional delegation of healthcare, so they argue authority from the commerce clause which gives congress the power to regulate interstate commerce. The courts have allowed a very broad interpretation of that power, but never have they treated a law that forces action on citizens by virtue of their citizenship. That is the individual mandate of Obamacare.
If the individual mandate of Obamacare is upheld, then the constitution is meaningless. Think of that the basic, fundamental supreme law, the foundation of our republic is meaningless. Substituted for law is the whim of the president or the majority party. A citizen can be forced to act, forced to spend money, on any manner of thing. Tree hugging liberals can force PV panel installation on your roof. Doctors can be forced to perform abortions. Adult children can be forced to euthanize their aged parents. There are literally no limits. Inactivity can be made illegal–as it is in Obamacare.
Now that is why these lawsuits contesting Obama’s power grab are so damn important. That is why 14 states are litigating and why 7 others are about to join them. The constitutional issue is paramount here. If Obama can assume the role of dictator, like his “mi amigo” Chavez, then this country is lost, our children will have no future.
My thanks to Elizabeth Crum for arranging these blogger conference calls and to the three other attorneys participating: Josh Hicks, former general counsel to the governor, Joel Hansen, the IAP candidate for AG, and Jacob Hafer, the GOP candidate for AG.
Constitutions are messy things for dictators. Obama and his liberal ilk know what’s best for the rest of us in the unwashed masses. They will do what they please as long as they are in power.
Mark Steyn Is Not a Hangover Cure!
Posted by Tom in Deficit, Democrats, Financial Policy, Nationalized Health Care, Statism, Taxation, Welfare on March 26, 2010
How bad can Obamacare get? What’s its effect on the U.S. economy? Mark Steyn’s NRO post, Obamacare Dystopia, gives us a slight indication: When the Bush Medicare Drug plan was added there were many retiree plans that included drug benefits. To incentivize those companies from dumping their retirees on the new Medicare drug plan, “Congress gave them a modest tax break equivalent to 28 percent of the const of the plan.” That has changed.
“Ask yourself this: If you impose a sudden 35 percent tax on something, are you likely to get as much of it? Go on, take a wild guess. On the day President Obama signed Obamacare into law, Verizon sent an e-mail to all its employees warning that the company’s costs “will increase in the short term.” And in the medium term? Well, U.S. corporations that are able to do so will get out of their prescription-drug plans and toss their retirees onto the Medicare pile. So far just three companies — Deere, Caterpillar, and ValeroEnergy— have calculated that the loss of the deduction will add a combined $265 million to their costs. There are an additional 3,500 businesses presently claiming the break. The cost to taxpayers of that 28 percent benefit is about $665 per person. The cost to taxpayers of equivalent Medicare coverage is about $1,200 per person. So we’re roughly doubling the cost of covering an estimated 5 million retirees.”
This is all so silly when you think that the tax favored employee medical insurance system has no reasonable basis in economics. It is compensation and should be treated as such, but isn’t under our tax law. And this is the source of our problems. But rather than acknowledge this and put consumers in control, Obama has chosen to put government in control regardless of the costs. Dependency is created.
Mark goes onto treat the facts that we can’t afford Obamacare given our current near bankrupt status with Democratic welfare unfunded liabilities and that this will inevitably bring a VAT tax added to our current tax structure that will doom us to peon status. He then looks ahead:
“All of the above is pretty much a safe bet. What about the imponderables? Even Obama hasn’t yet asked the CBO to cost out, say, what happens to the price of oil when the Straits of Hormuz are under a de facto Iranian nuclear umbrella — as they will be soon, because the former global hyperpower, which now gets mad over a few hundred housing units in Jerusalem, is blasé and insouciant about the wilder shores of the mullahs’ dreams. Or suppose, as seems to be happening, the Sino-Iranian alliance were to result in a reorientation of global oil relationships, or the Russo-Iranian friendship bloomed to such a degree that, between Moscow’s control of Europe’s gas supply and Teheran’s new role as Middle Eastern superpower, the economy of the entire developed world becomes dependent on an alliance profoundly hostile to it.”
Obama has set his course to ruin this nation. Pray that he fails!
Party’s Over……….Hangover Starts
Posted by Tom in Deficit, Democrats, National Debt, Nationalized Health Care, Social Security, Welfare on March 25, 2010
As Pelosi said, “we have to pass this bill so that you can find out what is in it.” Well, it’s still early, but we’re starting to find out. And it looks ugly. Publicly traded companies can’t hide, lie, and obfuscate bad news like the Democrats do, so Caterpillar announced a medical cost increase of at least $100 million in the first year alone. Deere and Verizon followed warning of a cost increase as a result of Obamacare. You can bet these announcements will be followed by more like them with consequent impact on employees and shareholders alike. See: WSJ’s Obamacare Day One, and Deer, Caterpillar: Health-Care Law to Raise Expenses.
But it’s not only public companies that will be effected. I spoke with a small Reno business owner about Obamacare impacts. This employer now provides healthcare to its 25 employees at significant expense and significant employee contribution. Under the new law, it will drop healthcare coverage and the employees can under the government insurance exchange obtain healthcare at approximately the same costs as they are contributing to the current group policy. Business profits improve, employees have the same expenses with the government subsidized insurance. Only the taxpayers lose.
Wait, that’s a gross understatement. Not only do the taxpayers lose now, but their children and grandchildren are saddled with staggering public debt and unfunded liabilities from Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. And now Obama has added a new, gigantic unfunded liability.
Thanks Nancy, we’re now starting to find out what’s in it!
Obama Exempt From Obamacare!
Posted by Tom in Democrats, Nationalized Health Care, Politics, Unions on March 24, 2010
Yes, despite several Republican attempts to have all Americans included in Obamacare they failed in the effort according to a Washington Times editorial today, No Obamacare for Obama! Obama has preached that the new healthcare will affect “every American family.” But Biden has corrected this falsehood and admitted that Obamacare will only apply to “ordinary Americans.” So, if I understand this correctly, it won’t apply to “extraordinary” Americans.
The Republican attempts at inclusiveness were frustrated by unions representing federal workers, the same unions that supported Obamacare. Then they tried to block an exemption for Congressional leadership and personal staff but this too was frustrated and senior officials of the executive branch including the president, vice president and cabinet members were also exempted.
As a result we have congressional staff that drafted the 2000+ page monstrosity exempt from its effects. We have unions who supported it exempt. We have Democratic leaders who voted for it out. And we have the president and senior administration officials exempt.
Bottom line, Obamacare is not good enough for Obama and his family. He’s just too “extraordinary!” Oh to be one of the ruling elite!
