Archive for category Social Security
If Greece is Europe’s Achilles Heel…and Europe Falls….
Posted by Tom in Economics, Entitlements, Europe, National Character, National Debt, Nationalized Health Care, Social Security, Welfare on April 28, 2010
I’ve seen items from John Muldin and George Friedman this week analyzing the Greek debt/deficit debacle. Greece is one of the PIIGS of Club Med, the European nations who cannot afford their welfare systems. Greece cannot borrow to fund its largess; its credit rating is junk according to S&P. It is seeking European and IMF bailout aid, the amount of which is dependent on uncovering the accounting tricks it has heretofore used. Normally the IMF would use devaluation as one tool but that is not possible here because of the Euro. Greece will fail.
Sovereign debt problems are forecast for Spain and Portugal also, as they have suffered downgrades. Causes of their problems are similar but the significance is greater as the Spanish economy along with Italy which may follow soon is simply too big for Germany to bail out. Fiscal contagion is a serious problem.
So, let a few PIIGS fail, so what? Problem here is with the European banks. They hold the PIIGS bonds. Without regard to those underwater assets, the European banks were already in trouble since they did not clean up their bad real estate related assets. Think the Japanese banks of the 1990s. Friedman says the even at the peak of the U.S. subprime crisis European banks were in worse shape. How much worse shape now with the PIIGS crisis?
A Euro devaluation? A break-up of the European Union? At least, a significant period of de-stability for a major consumer in the world economy and a significant producer in that economy. Germany will survive in better shape than the rest. The PIIGS are likely to exist outside a re-formed European Union.
Add the fact that the U.S. is not the consumer that it once was. Thankfully, it is de-leveraging more, saving more, and consuming less. It hopes to expand its exports but who will pay the desired price? China? The rest of Asia? Thus the world economy will really be upside-down with a lot of areas trying to be producers but none trying to be consumers!
But the real concern is that the U.S. is a budding Greece bubble waiting to pop. In ten short years 93 cents of every dollar of government revenue will go to pay entitlements and interest on the debt. Obama has put us on the path to become a Europe on steroids just when Europe is exploding! Before Obama took office our entitlements thanks to Roosevelt, Johnson and Bush were on an unsustainable path. Rather than correct this Obama added another major entitlement, Obamacare, which will bankrupt our nation.
Several questions present themselves in this scenario: What of defense? Iran, North Korea, Russia and China are all real and potential problems. We spend so much on butter that we con’t afford guns. What of our assets and businesses? In a declining economy how will be work, live and invest? And, from a personal survival standpoint if the economy declines toward the subsistance level, is it guns and gold to survive? I know my farming skills aren’t all that good!
But there is hope if we recognize that big government must be drastically cut, public employee pensions and compensation reduced to the level of private compensation, entitlements including social security, medicare and medicaid cut in half, and Obamacare repealed and replaced by consumer-based, non-tax advantaged health care. We have a very short window in which to accomplish this dramatic turnaround. Let’s educate the voters and elect people who will get the job done.
Party’s Over……….Hangover Starts
Posted by Tom in Deficit, Democrats, National Debt, Nationalized Health Care, Social Security, Welfare on March 25, 2010
As Pelosi said, “we have to pass this bill so that you can find out what is in it.” Well, it’s still early, but we’re starting to find out. And it looks ugly. Publicly traded companies can’t hide, lie, and obfuscate bad news like the Democrats do, so Caterpillar announced a medical cost increase of at least $100 million in the first year alone. Deere and Verizon followed warning of a cost increase as a result of Obamacare. You can bet these announcements will be followed by more like them with consequent impact on employees and shareholders alike. See: WSJ’s Obamacare Day One, and Deer, Caterpillar: Health-Care Law to Raise Expenses.
But it’s not only public companies that will be effected. I spoke with a small Reno business owner about Obamacare impacts. This employer now provides healthcare to its 25 employees at significant expense and significant employee contribution. Under the new law, it will drop healthcare coverage and the employees can under the government insurance exchange obtain healthcare at approximately the same costs as they are contributing to the current group policy. Business profits improve, employees have the same expenses with the government subsidized insurance. Only the taxpayers lose.
Wait, that’s a gross understatement. Not only do the taxpayers lose now, but their children and grandchildren are saddled with staggering public debt and unfunded liabilities from Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. And now Obama has added a new, gigantic unfunded liability.
Thanks Nancy, we’re now starting to find out what’s in it!
Add Costs, Regulation, & Government…Subtract a Bright Future
Posted by Tom in Centrally Managed Economy, Democrats, Nationalized Health Care, Social Security, Welfare on March 21, 2010
Douglas Holtz-Eakin, former director of the CBO, penned an op-ed in the NYT yesterday, The Real Arithmetic of Health Care Reform, in which he points out that the CBO’s ten-year cost estimate of $950 billion and deficit reduction of $138 billion is an estimate of fantasy. The CBO can’t comment on the fictions in the bill before it. The current Obamacare bill will actually produce a deficit increase of $562 for the same reasons outlined by Paul Ryan. He uses words like, gimmicks, budgetary games, front loading costs without benefits, leaving costs out entirely, manipulates, slight of hand, unrealistic, and stolen.
“The stakes could not be higher. As documented in another recent budget office analysis, the federal deficit is already expected to exceed at least $700 billion every year over the next decade, doubling the national debt to more than $20 trillion. By 2020, the federal deficit — the amount the government must borrow to meet its expenses — is projected to be $1.2 trillion, $900 billion of which represents interest on previous debt……..The health care legislation would only increase this crushing debt. It is a clear indication that Congress does not realize the urgency of putting America’s fiscal house in order.”
Holtz-Eakkin’s piece largely confirms a post by Cato’s Michael Tanner in NRO this weekend, Predictions; Reno Hayek members will recall that Michael spoke to us last year about this time. He reasonably prognosticates: One, that the bill will cost more than advertised not only because of the gimmicks and deceit but because all major government programs do. In ‘65 Medicare was projected to cost $9 billion by 1990; it came in seven times higher at $67 billion. Two, insurance premiums will increase. The bill will do nothing to lessen the 200% increase, by CBO estimate. Three, quality of care will be worse. The bill will accelerate doctor retirements at the same time it adds patients to the system.
Scarier yet, four, the leftist will keep pushing for more. To quote Pelosi, “once we kick through this door, there’ll be more legislation to follow,” in other words, this is the first step to single payer government healthcare. Five, Republicans won’t try to repeal it because they won’t be able to get the required veto proof majority in both houses or the presidency plus the filibuster proof Senate.
At a time when serious attention should be devoted to getting our fiscal house in order, by at a minimum avoiding the demographically certain failure of medicare, social security and medicaid, Obama has loaded the country’s future generation with a new middle class entitlement destine for the same future as those welfare programs. It will beget unsustainable debt, burdensome regulation, and big government growth and taxation which will detract from our future private economy. It is the greatest intergenerational immorality in modern times.
Our Creditors Are Nervous……..Do You Blame Them?
Posted by Tom in Centrally Managed Economy, Deficit, Financial Policy, Foreign Trade, Monetary Policy, National Debt, Nationalized Health Care, Social Security, Statism, Welfare on March 15, 2010
Bloomberg reports today that China and Japan reduced their holdings of U.S. Treasuries again in January. In fact, China has been a net seller for three straight months.
“Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao this week sought assurances that the U.S. will protect the value of China’s dollar assets. At a press conference in Beijing marking the end of China’s annual parliamentary meetings two days ago, Wen said dollar volatility is a “big” concern and “I’m still worried” about China’s U.S. currency holdings.”
“Wen urged U.S. officials to “take concrete steps to reassure investors” about the safety of dollar assets, repeating concerns that he expressed a year ago, sparked by a growing U.S. fiscal deficit.”
“China’s share of U.S. bills, notes and bonds in January amounted to 24 percent of the total $3.7 trillion in Treasuries owned by investors abroad, up from 19 percent three years ago, according to Treasury data.”
With record Obama deficits, unsustainable national debt, and gigantic unfunded liabilities from welfare programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security inflation is a real threat. Add to that the demographically certain bankruptcy of these programs, the worry becomes all the more acute. Instead of a sober attempt to remedy the situation we have a socialist president on a hell-bent-for-leather campaign to add to welfare with Obamacare’s takeover of 16% of the U.S. economy. So Obama’s answer to a non-economic, non-functioning welfare system is to add a gigantic new program to it. How, with gimmicks and double counting!
If your a creditor with long-dated U.S. paper it’s reasonable to think you will be paid back with devalued dollars. And given the uncertainty caused by Obama’s socialistic, statist push of the economy, it’s reasonable to think that American consumers will not be back to buy your exports anytime soon. How can they, they don’t have jobs!
In short, our creditors should worry. And we should worry all the more!
Tom Motherway
A Politician Who Tells the Hard Truth
Posted by Tom in Deficit, Nationalized Health Care, Politics, Social Security, Welfare on March 4, 2010
I listened to Chris Matthews MSNBC’s leftist Obama fan at the Bohemian Grove last summer and met him after the panel discussion; he is indeed liberal. That made me appreciate all the more his recent interview with Representative Paul Ryan from Wisconsin. The “unsustainability” of the current welfare system is the topic and Chris recognizes our need to defend ourselves at the same time, but he doesn’t seem to connect the dots!
In any case, I like this guy, Ryan.
Tom Motherway
Nevada’s Constitutional Standoff-Governor Gibbons is Correct
Posted by Tom in Economics, Education Facts & Policies, Nevada, Politics, Social Security, Unions on January 11, 2010
The spend and spend Democrats in the Nevada Legislature and their SEIU and Teachers Union (NSEA) employers have bristled at Governor Gibbons proposal to put the state back on the track of fiscal responsibility and adopt his educational reform proposal.
To refresh your memory from my January 7th post, the proposal embodied the following:
- Abolish collective bargaining. This has no place in government.
- Abolish the class-size reduction program, a make-work union rule. (There were 70 in my 3rd grade with one teacher!)
- Create a statewide school voucher system.
- Eliminate full-day kindergarten requirement.
- Repeal the prohibition against using student achievement data in teacher evaluations. Another union boondoggle rule!
Sensible, practical proposals for a state facing deficits, unfunded liabilities, and declining revenue this year and next at the very minimum. But the fat cat Democrats howled because their union bosses told them to howl!
So the Governor has asked the legislative leadership to draft bills along those lines for consideration in a special session. The Democratic leadership has refused. The Governor has contemplated a lawsuit against the legislature. Unfortunately this has echos of Guinn v. Legislature. Recall that was another phony, laughable suit filed by RINO Guinn and his then Attorney General Brian Sandoval against the legislature to compel action on the budget. Result: laughable decision derided nationally as reported in the WSJ and finally recanted by the same Supreme Court that issued it!
The Governor has correctly made his point. The Democrats have made theirs and shown who owns them–not the voters but the unions! The remedy for this constitutional standoff is at the ballot box, not in the Supreme Court. Simply, the Court cannot legally, constitutionally compel legislative action. The Democrats will have failed to do their Constitutional duty to consider legislation proposed to correct our fiscal insanity. Then, let the Nevada voters decide if they want the public servants making more money, with better benefits, and higher unfunded pensions that the average voters have. Let the Nevada voters decide if they want the state and local governments to be bankrupt while the fat cat Democrats laugh all the way to the bank.
Unfortunately, Brian Sandoval the Republican candidate opposing Governor Jim Gibbons for the party’s nomination, has shown himself to be the spend and spend RINO he was when he argued the Guinn v. Legislature lawsuit many years ago. He too opposes Governor Guinn’s very good proposals on education reform and fiscal sanity.
Tom Motherway